Recent media publications and community interactions seem to be very much inclusive of the notion that an individual may want to ‘identify’ as something they are not. The reality of this matter is not only convoluted and confusing, but definitive attempts to align with this sort of ideology are not only unacceptable to the establishment but also (potentially) damaging to the individual asserting to do so. Extreme efforts to ‘swing’ in this direction are often close to (if not) permanently psychologically debasing, and the logistics of extreme support for extreme “false identity” subjectivity – A. Do not actually solve or assist individuals with what they are trying to accomplish or who they (really / truly) are as a person and B. The long terms ramifications of touting a false identity within social process easily and often leads to very discomforting outcomes if not shortly after, then probably most certainly within a span of years following.
Here’s an entirely logical spin on what’s actually going on; “gender identity ideology” is not, in and of itself an actual thing. It’s a sub-type of a particular thing and merely one sub-type at that. The more realistic interpretation of what (at root semblance) is actually happening can be referred to as “falsity identity self-identification”, where the basis of what’s going on seems more associated with a somewhat schizo-sociopathic reaction to a logistical failure in being able to “find one’s self” mixed in with the chaos and unpredictability of regular social structure and social process.
When a child is bullied on the playground at school, although not necessarily a good or most appropriate reaction, some children (in said position) will go home miserable and upset, thinking to themselves “just what till I get bigger” or “I’ll find a way to show that bully who I really am”; in which case violence begets violence, hatred incurs hatred and a seemingly endless amount of negative propulsion implants itself into a growing, changing social dynamic. Years (maybe many years), sometimes generations later, the accumulated hatred and negativity of all of these ‘tit for tat’ type manifestations of historical inappropriateness compile themselves into an immediate, pressure-releasing social invalidity where huge segments of the population are fed up to the nines with how life has been treating them.
Previously miniature incursions into falsity identity logistics have always been growing in the back of their mind and suddenly, as the steam cap blows and the wrongfulness, negativity and hatred just can’t be held back any longer, a reactionary narcissanity develops; no longer merely a schizo-sociopathic like coping mechanism, the falsity identity consideration thrives in abundance as masses of lost individuals combine together in publicly accessible institutions, around town and on the street.
Everything that’s not actually happening (but years of pent up frustration of wrong things – such as misladen interpretations and miscommunications – where the interpreted perception didn’t actually exist) is exactly what ends up bothering them the most. The world in which they used to exist, fraught with emotional negativity, emotional distress, emotional trauma and emotional burden comes heathing to the surface of their engagements within society and especially those closet to themselves. As the hoard collective grows in abundance, they are each (individually) strengthened within and amongst themselves – feeding off of each others misapprehensions, misinterpretations and negative baggage, these individuals use their narcissanity as a badge of honour, inflating their defected egos and placating each other with predominantly (at least mildly or somewhat if not grossly or greatly) incorrect understandings, interpretations and assignations; together they call the battle cry of this or that slogan and band together seeking comfort in their identity squalor, rallying against the social element they feel had been holding them down for so many years as they ‘erupt’; brandishing inanity like a weapon and falsity as if the lies were somehow a genuine form of self identity, the nearly subconsciously enacted hoard of falsity battalion co-predominates its will upon whatever it can find, be they documents, recorded histories and/or recorded registries trying to shift the chaos of the somewhat (and/or predominantly) malformed logistics of their incorrect interpretations, deftly hoping to reshape their self identity into something their comfortable with in the way they society relates to the personality considerations they (have) develop(ed).
Side notes:
“Subjective Narcisanity” can happen at any point at any time to any individual specific and typical to the logistics of subjectivity, specifically and especially to dependency necessary subjects. Although there is no clear determinant as to exactly why this condition happens, there are several notable considerations and several evident logistics typically involved within this particular logistic.
1. Subjective narcisanity is way more predominant to civio-systemic social logistics ( civic-systemia sociology) than it is to merely civil society alone.
2. Relative specifically to elements such as non-compatible authority, combinatorial subjectivity subjective to multi-dimensional systems functions (as a depend typically as a dependent subject) and psychological unknowns specific to ongoing, evolving and growing elements along the lines of jungian psychological logistics (mass collectivity and collective subconsciousness).