Analyzing a complex “nang kernel”:
What is #1, the KEY factor in terms of the problem inherent; i.e. what seems to be the predominant ism in terms of what is being discussed as the central issue and which category, group or type of person/people is inherently suffering or being detrimented in terms of this particular negatively intoned ism?
What then are the critical factors in terms of individual (i.e. specific) balancing points by which the key factor is inherent as a problem in terms of that particular (negatively intoned / intended) ism or contrast by which that category, group or type suffers or is being detrimented because of?
Third, what are specific reference points of discussion and balance by which those points listed as critical factors are able to be modified or related upon in a way that will ameliorate the key factor in a way that positively assists, re-balances and/or abides to remediate that situation in a way the helps that overall problem?
Fourth and last of all, what do the above three analysis considerations result in telling us in terms of a complex representation of considerations and what kind of map can be drawn or laid out in terms what kind of solutions can we enable from this analysis and discussion of said key factor problem?